*****THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY PROJECT***(PROJECTO FASCISTA)

[Dr Pisenlov]

http://www.newamericancentury.org/Images/banner.gif
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Images/addy2.gif

No se cuantos de Ustedes hayan OIDO hablar del PNAC o PROJECTO FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY .Este no es un projecto SECRETO ni con PERSONAJES DESCONOCIDOS ,Ni menos con AGENDAS SECRETAS es un PROJECTO .ABIERTO ya veran ..
El documento INICIAL de este projecto se fue OBTENIDO por la prensa y publicado(abajo pondre esta otra historia) .Y una vez todo el tamal abierto decidieron simplemente NO NEGARLO (para que si eso lo ivan a hacer bien en FRENTE DE TODO EL MUNDO ,ademas el PUEBLO AMERICANO ES UN PUEBLO PENDEJO)
The new american century .Tiene un web site .Y ahi estan todas las estrategias abiertamente expuestas ,todo lo que la administracion gringa ha hecho ,ahi estan los documentos para que vean LOS DIENTES DEL ANIMAL : http://www.newamericancentury.org/index.html .
El documento mas increible es el de su FUNDACION

Lo pongo pues es PURO FASCISMO ,pero documento historico .Solo miiren quienes lo FIRMAN
El documento esta aca : http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
Leanlo y luego lo discutimos ..


June 3, 1997

American foreign and defense policy is adrift. Conservatives have criticized the incoherent policies of the Clinton Administration. They have also resisted isolationist impulses from within their own ranks. But conservatives have not confidently advanced a strategic vision of America's role in the world. They have not set forth guiding principles for American foreign policy. They have allowed differences over tactics to obscure potential agreement on strategic objectives. And they have not fought for a defense budget that would maintain American security and advance American interests in the new century.

We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.


As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?


We are in danger of squandering the opportunity and failing the challenge. We are living off the capital -- both the military investments and the foreign policy achievements -- built up by past administrations. Cuts in foreign affairs and defense spending, inattention to the tools of statecraft, and inconstant leadership are making it increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world. And the promise of short-term commercial benefits threatens to override strategic considerations. As a consequence, we are jeopardizing the nation's ability to meet present threats and to deal with potentially greater challenges that lie ahead.

We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration's success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States' global responsibilities.


Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.

Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:

• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;


• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;


• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;


• we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.

Elliott Abrams* * Gary Bauer* * William J. Bennett* * Jeb Bush <--------------el hermano del pendejo Presidente

Dick Cheney* * Eliot A. Cohen* * Midge Decter* * Paula Dobriansky* * Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg* * Francis Fukuyama* * Frank Gaffney* * Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan* * Zalmay Khalilzad* * I. Lewis Libby* * Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle* * Peter W. Rodman* * Stephen P. Rosen* * Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld* * Vin Weber* * George Weigel* * Paul Wolfowitz

[Dr Pisenlov]

Una vez mas es este no es un DOCUMENTO SECRETO es un documento que puede verse aca : http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

En 1997 todos los judios y fascistas conservadores asociados a los lobys militarindustriales y AL PETROLEO ,que vendrian a CONFORMAR la PROXIMA ADMINISTRACION BUSH . firmaron este documento en el que basicamente se COMPROMETEN a CONTROLAR EL MUNDO CON NUEVO ARMAMENTO

Elliott Abrams* * Gary Bauer* * William J. Bennett* * Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney* * Eliot A. Cohen* * Midge Decter* * Paula Dobriansky* * Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg* * Francis Fukuyama* * Frank Gaffney* * Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan* * Zalmay Khalilzad* * I. Lewis Libby* * Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle* * Peter W. Rodman* * Stephen P. Rosen* * Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld* * Vin Weber* * George Weigel* * Paul Wolfowitz

Entre estos signatarios estan Cheney, Cohen,Rumesfeld,Wolfowitz* solo falta el otro judio de Perle ahi ,Y tienen a toda la inteligencia FASCISTA .Y BUSH ??
Ese idiota es solo una MARIONETA .*

[Dr Pisenlov]

LA GUERRA DE IRAK

La Guerra de IRAK HABIA SIDO PLANEADA en 1998 POR TODOS LOS FASCISTAS SIGNATARIOS DEL NEW AMERICAN CENTURY

He aca la carta a CLINTON tambien se encuentra en ese sitio http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm


January 26, 1998



The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC


Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.

The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if not impossible to monitor Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam’s secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons.


Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.


Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy, which depends for its success upon the steadfastness of our coalition partners and upon the cooperation of Saddam Hussein, is dangerously inadequate. The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.

We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy, we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.

We urge you to act decisively. If you act now to end the threat of weapons of mass destruction against the U.S. or its allies, you will be acting in the most fundamental national security interests of the country. If we accept a course of weakness and drift, we put our interests and our future at risk.

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitage William J. Bennett

Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky

Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad

William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W. Rodman

Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber

Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick



We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts

MIREN QUIENES FIRMAN LA CARTA TODOS LOS JUDIOS DE LOS LOBYES MILITAROINDUSTRIALES .. PERLE , WOLFOWITZ ,ABRAMS,KRISTOL

LUEGO DARE TODOS LOS CVS DE ESTOS INDIVIDUOS FASCISTAS PRO_ ISRALEIS

[Dr Pisenlov]

El PROJECTO THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY ES UN PROJECTO DE DOMINACION ,DONDE LOS LINEAMIENTOS SON CONTROLADOS POR LOS LOBIES MILITAROINDUSTRIALES .Y ES BASADO EN UNA DOTRINA DE REARME ,PARA SEGURAR LA CONTINUIDAD DE ESTADOS UNIDOS COMO POTENCIA MILITAR SUPREMA EN EL SIGLO 21 .ESTO NO ES UNA MERA INTERPRETACION DE UN DOCUMENTO .SON MUCHOS LOS DOCUMENTOS QUE PRECISAMENTE EXPLICAN LO QUE HAY QUE HACER . INCREMENTAR EL NUMERO DE LAS FUERZAS MILITARES A NIVELES* GUERRA FRIA .TAMBIEN CAPACITARLOS A PODER OPERAR EN VARIOS TEATROS DE GUERRA SIMULATENEOS .INCREMENTAR LOS PRESUPUESTOS DE GASTOS MILITARES .ESTO DIRIGIDO POR LOS JUDIOS ESOS QUE CONTROLAN LOS MERCADOS DE ARMAS .Y DE MANERA GENERAL DOTARSE DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGIAS MILITARES .LA GUERRA EN IRAK DIRECTAMENTE TENIA UN PROPOSITO Y ERA PRINCIPALMENTE DESACERSE DE UN GOBIERNO HOSTIL A ISRAEL CON LA AYUDA DE PATRIOTAS ISRAELITAS ENPOTRADOS EN LA ADMINISTRACION AMERICANA .TAL AVENTURA NO ES TAN DESCABELLADA CUANDO TIENE TAMBIEN COMO BENEFICIO EL DE PROBAR NUEVAS TEORIAS MILITARES EN CAMPOS DE BATALLA URBANOS ,QUE DE OTRA MANERA NO PODIAN SER PROBADOS .TODOS SAMEBOS COMO SE INICIO ESA GUERRA ,CORRESPONDE EXACTAMENTE A ESOS DOCUMENTOS LETRA POR LETRA .ESO SI ELLOS NO PODIAN PREVEER QUE ENFRENTE DESENCADENARIAN UNA NUEVA ESTRATEGIA DEL ENEMIGO CON LA CUAL NO HABIA NINGUN PLAN DE CONTENCION . PENSARON QUE LO QUE LOS JUDIOS PERLE ,WOLFOVITCH CONSEJEROS DE BUSH EN MATERIA MILITAR SE CUMPLIRIA A LA LETRA .EL PUEBLO IRAKI LIBERADO ,Y ELLOS CONTROLANDO UNO DE LOS YACIMIENTOS DE PETROLEO MAS FRUCTIFEROS DEL MUNDO Y DE MAS FACIL EXTRACCION .PARA CHENEY Y BUSH ,RICE ,PETROLEROS ERA MUSICA PARA SUS OIDOS ..RESULTADO ..TIENEN LA GASOLINA MAS CARA EN LA HISTORIA Y ENTRE TANTA ESTUPIDEZ ,CHINA SE LES FUE ARRIBA Y LES PERDIO EL RESPETO .AHORA CHINA LES MUESTRA LOS DIENTES CON RESPECTO A TAIWAN .. SI UN PAR DE TORNADOS PONE EN DECADENCIA A* ESTADOS UNIDOS* ,QUE TAL UN PAR DE BOMBAS ATOMICAS EN NEW YORK Y EN LA HOOVER DAM ..CHINA RECUPERARA A TAIWAN Y NO HAY NADA QUE LOS GRINGOS PUEDAN HACER

[Dr Pisenlov]

HE ACA EL DETALLE DE LOS PROJECTOS MILITARES QUE TRATARON DE REVIVIR ,PERO POR GASTOS DE LA GUERRA MUCHOS FUERON CANCELADOS

ESTABLISH FOUR CORE MISSIONS for U.S. military forces:
• defend the American homeland; <-----------LES CAYO EL 9/11
• fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars;<----JAJAJAJAJAJJAJ POBLACIONES DE NEW ORLEANS AND HUSTON
• perform the “constabulary” duties associated with shaping the security environment in
critical regions;
• transform U.S. forces to exploit the “revolution in military affairs;”
To carry out these core missions, we need to provide sufficient force and budgetary
allocations. In particular, the United States must:
MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, basing the U.S. nuclear deterrent upon a < NUEVAS ARMAS ATOMICAS Y NO QUIEREN QUE IRAN LAS TENGA
global, nuclear net assessment that weighs the full range of current and emerging threats,

MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while<---------BAJARON EL NUMERO DE AVIONES
increasing purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding submarine
and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and medium-weight
ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey “tilt-rotor” aircraft for the Marine<-------AJAJ ESA MIERDA NUNCA FUNCIONO ,SE MATARON VARIOS MAJES
Corps.
CANCEL “ROADBLOCK” PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier,
and Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon funding
while providing limited improvements to current capabilities. Savings from these canceled
programs should be used to spur the process of military transformation.
DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and
American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world.
CONTROL THE NEW “INTERNATIONAL COMMONS” OF SPACE AND “CYBERSPACE,” and pave
the way for the creation of a new military service – U.S. Space Forces – with the mission of
space control.
EXPLOIT THE “REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS” to insure the long-term superiority of<---- EL SUPER SOLDADO , MITAD SER HUMANO MITAD MAQUINA
U.S. conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which
• maximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced <-----TAMBIEN TRABAJAN EN UN TRAJE "INVISIBLE" CON FIBRAS OPTICAS
technologies, and,
• produces more profound improvements in military capabilities, encourages competition
between single services and joint-service experimentation efforts.
INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross
domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually.
not merely the U.S.-Russia balance.
RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH of today’s force to roughly the levels anticipated in<-----JAJA YA NADIE QUIERE ENLISTARSE SOLO SALVADOREñOS
the “Base Force” outlined by the Bush Administration, an increase in active-duty strength<---Y MEJICANOS POR PAPELES
from 1.4 million to 1.6 million.
REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting
permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval
deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia.

[Dr Pisenlov]

HE ACA COMO SE SUPO DE LA EXISTENCIA SECRETA DE ESE GRUPO FASCISTA Y DE LA NUEVA PAXA AMARICANA

http://www.fpif.org/papers/02men/index.html
pongo solo un poco ,el que quiera leer todo el documento puede consultarlo ARRIBA


When he first saw the excerpts leaked to The New York Times in spring 1992, Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE) was horrified and denounced the document as a prescription for “literally a Pax Americana.”1 The leak, a draft Defense Policy Guidance (DPG) on U.S. grand strategy through the 1990s, was stunning in the clarity and ambition of its vision for a new U.S. foreign and military policy. Written in the aftermath of the Gulf War by two relatively obscure political appointees in the Pentagon’s policy department of the Bush Sr. administration, the draft DPG called for U.S. military preeminence over Eurasia by preventing the rise of any potentially hostile power and a policy of preemption against states suspected of developing weapons of mass destruction. It foretold a world in which U.S. military intervention overseas would become “a constant feature” and failed to even mention the United Nations.

Although softened in its final form at the insistence of then National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft and Secretary of State James Baker, the draft DPG occupied a central place in the hearts and minds of its two authors, Paul Wolfowitz and I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, and their boss, then Pentagon chief Dick Cheney. A decade later, theory was transformed into practice following the devastating terrorist attack on September 11. By then, Dick Cheney had already become the most powerful vice president in U.S. history, and the draft DPG’s two authors, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Cheney’s chief of staff and national security adviser, Lewis Libby, had moved to the center of foreign policy-making in the Bush administration. They, along with Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld, have led a coalition of forces that has successfully engineered what former UN ambassador Richard Holbrooke recently described as a “radical break with 55 years of bipartisan tradition” in U.S. foreign policy.2

[ICARUS]

???

[Bill]

Interesantes documentos.
Esta noche (espero no estar muy cansado como ayer) visitaré ese sitio.
Con este nuevo foro tengo bastante que leer* ::) , me acuso de no haber terminado de leer el manifiesto del Unabomber, otro tema que me ha interesado, y ahora se agrega a la lista este sitio.
Gracias por apuntarnos a información interesante.
Por cierto, la modificacion que hice a tu posteo inicial fue solo para reducir el tamaño de la imagen, dado a que en la pagina frontal desplazaba los bloques laterales por ser muy grande.

Saludos.

[El Diablo]

interesante, pero hay que leerlo con calma ......... gracias por esta joya

[boybox]

Bueno lo que medio pude leer entiendo que esa politica es la misma politica del garrote a nivel mundial.
Si recuerdan en la Historia de EU el segundo presidente James Monroe implemento esa politica del garrote de no permitir que ni los ingleses, ni los españoles y ni los franceses tomaran tierras en las colonias de America recien independizadas.
Pero realmente la politica exterior era de ellos era "este es mi patio y aqui nadie se puede meter"
Ahora esta politica realmente no es nueva sino que quiza es un pulimiento de la misma politica del garrote "el mundo es mi patio y nadie se puede meter"

[kopky99]

tu posteo es tan interesante, pero me alegra que haya algien que no dejaria
pasar en alto esta nota!

[TEPEZCUINTLE]

Si yo hubiese traido el tema, me hubieran acusado de andar planteando propaganda anti republinazi, asi como tambien de andar levantando especulaciones o planteando "teorias conspirativas".

La verdad es que ese proyecto ya habia salido en muchos medios. No es secreto para nadie que en si el actual gobierno tuvo en su gabinete administrativo esa linea.

Tanto asi que hoy vemos los resultados de la destruccion de la misma constitucion gringa que protegia los derechos civiles.

[tocho]

Un buen amigo me ilumino en el tema hace anos. Me parece que la inexplicable invacion a iraq, tenia que ver con esto. Pero lo bueno es que no les sirvio. Los gringos estan resiviendo un castigo en iraq hoy, espero que ese castido lleve a los republicanos a perder el poder.